Relax Fellow Geeks and Nerds. Roger Ebert Has Apologized.
Premium Content
You need to be a Feast of Fun Plus+ member to access this.
Join now
or Log in – it's easy!
I must admit, I am a bit of a “gaymer.” I own a Playstation 3, know who Adam Sessler is, and can explain why the Wii’s technology is actually only popular, not technologically advanced. Like […]
Oscar Nominated Short 2012: The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore
Alton DuLaney: Art & the Art of Gift Wrapping
FOF #2974 – David Wojnarowicz’s Art Against AIDS
FOF #2901 – Art in the Age of COVID-19
Comments
video games can TOTALLY be an art.
The game that made me a believer in this was Ninja Gaiden 2 for the NES.
Incredible story line, awesome (at the time) scene animation, great gameplay and control. It was the first game that I ever truly loved and I will forever consider it to be a work of art.
Thanks Alex for your input! I totally agree! I had that game back the day and wish I still had it! The game I always consider to be a current manifestation of “art” in the industry is the Bioshock franchise. Not only is the art direction and sound design some of the best I’ve experienced, it’s story is better written than most films today.
Bioshock is a beautiful game. I was kinda disappointed with the sequel though. It didn’t feel as new & original.
The Special edition box was definitely a work of art. The packaging is absolutely beautiful 馃榾
Everyone keeps saying that about the sequel, but I kind of have to disagree. I think the industry gets too wrapped up in what is “new” vs. what is “good.” Frankly, I think for reviewers it almost discredits their opinion by using this we’re not as impressed because its not the first time being submersed into a game environment. Are we supposed to believe that in the first one “X, Y, and Z” gave the game a 10/10, but for the sequel those same things only get it a 7/10?
Wow I just rambled, but do you see my point. While innovation is great and necessary, it shouldn’t be the basis for a game’s review if the original was already spectacular. Any review of anything should be perceived as a stand alone, not compared to other things.
HMmmm…Eeeeeehh….i agree and disagree. Originality and innovation shouldn’t be the sole merit a game (or anything for that matter) is judged on. However, it should count for something.
I guess It really depends on what view point you’re looking at it from.
For me, as a developer, Bioshock was refreshing, beautiful and exciting. A real fresh of fresh air. It was fun to play, and by the end it felt like a journey worth playing.
Bioshock2 was still a great game, but it didn’t feel as thrilling and exciting. It really felt like the new developer had simply tried to re-create the first game instead of try to push the story and original ideas forward.
I really like the old review systems where they’d break it down to multiple criteria eg. Enjoyability, visuals, Originality, Replay value etc.
As an artist currently working for a video game studio i’ve seen first hand how much of an art form a GOOD video game can be; just like any GOOD movie.
This guy obviously has no clue what he’s even talking about.
I think video games are a bit overrated though. Still he’s entitled to saying a couple of grouchy things, right?
As much as i’m entitled to critique something i’m not all that familiar with.
Everyone’s entitled to their opinion.
As a “professional” FILM critic he should know better. It’d be like writing about a restaurant he thinks is crap in one of his film review columns.